Reid v. Campbell

57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21757, 1995 WL 361122

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 16, 1995
• Docket: 94-7056
• Status: Published

Opinion

57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clarence REID; Thomas D. Crooks; Van Tyler, Jr.; Alfred
R. McEachin; Fesse Laney; Michael Page,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and Charles Francis Habighorst; Nathaniel James; Reginald
McCants; Anthony R. Taylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Carroll A. CAMPBELL, Jr., Governor of the State of South
Carolina; Parker Evatt, Commissioner of the South Carolina
Department of Corrections; Richard A. Harpootlian,
Solicitor for the Fifth Judicial Circuit of South Carolina;
Lawrence Richter, State Senator for Charleston County, South
Carolina; Steve Landford, State Representative for
Spartanburg County, South Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7056.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 16, 1995.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Clarence Reid, Thomas D. Crooks, Van Tyler, Jr., Alfred R. McEachin, Fesse Laney, Michael Page, Appellants Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reid v. Campbell, No. CA-94-2095-3-20-A (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.