Reid Smith v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America
This text of 489 F.2d 1275 (Reid Smith v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The decision of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in United States v. Reid Smith, sub nom., United States v. Denison, 71 I.D. 144 (1964). See also Barrows v. Hickel 447 F.2d 80, 83 (C.A.9 1971).
The consolidation of appellant’s hearing with others did not affect his substantial rights.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 F.2d 1275, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-smith-v-rogers-c-b-morton-secretary-of-the-interior-of-the-united-ca9-1974.