Reid Smith v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America
489 F.2d 1275, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10265
Opinion
ORDER
The decision of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in United States v. Reid Smith, sub nom., United States v. Denison, 71 I.D. 144 (1964). See also Barrows v. Hickel 447 F.2d 80, 83 (C.A.9 1971).
The consolidation of appellant’s hearing with others did not affect his substantial rights.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reid Smith v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America, 489 F.2d 1275, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10265 (9th Cir. 1974).
489 F.2d 1275 (Reid Smith v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barrows v. Hickel
447 F.2d 80 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)