Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge

73 N.W. 391, 115 Mich. 418
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The proceedings in these cases are governed by the statute, and not by the rules of court. Fish v. Barbour, 43 Mich. 19. The entry of plaintiff’s default in not filing its declaration was premature. It was entitled to file a declaration at any time before the end of the next term after the return of the writ. 2 How. Stat. § 7312.

The writ will issue as prayed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge, 73 N.W. 391, 115 Mich. 418 (Mich. 1897).

73 N.W. 391 (Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotel Grunewald Co. v. Brakenridge
13 Tiess. 174 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1916)
Wright v. Wayne Circuit Judge
78 N.W. 545 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)