Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge

73 N.W. 391, 115 Mich. 418

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 N.W. 391 (Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reid, Murdock & Co. v. Benzie Circuit Judge, 73 N.W. 391, 115 Mich. 418 (Mich. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The proceedings in these cases are governed by the statute, and not by the rules of court. Fish v. Barbour, 43 Mich. 19. The entry of plaintiff’s default in not filing its declaration was premature. It was entitled to file a declaration at any time before the end of the next term after the return of the writ. 2 How. Stat. § 7312.

The writ will issue as prayed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The proceedings in these cases are governed by the statute, and not by the rules of court. Fish v. Barbour, 43 Mich. 19. The entry of plaintiff’s default in not filing its declaration was premature. It was entitled to file a declaration at any time before the end of the next term after the return of the writ. 2 How. Stat. § 7312.

The writ will issue as prayed.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 N.W. 391, 115 Mich. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-murdock-co-v-benzie-circuit-judge-mich-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack