Reichle v. Mayeri

110 A.D.2d 694, 488 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48586
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1985·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Treating plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim to recover damages for assault as a motion for summary judgment, Special Term denied the motion, citing the existence of issues of fact and questions of credibility which would require resolution by a trier of fact. We agree. The affidavits submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, all by persons with personal knowledge of the events surrounding the alleged assault, establish that substantial questions of fact and issues of credibility exist, thereby precluding the granting of summary judgment. Moreover, in an action to recover damages for assault, physical injury need not be present but only “a grievous affront or threat to the person” (Di Gilio v Burns Intl. Detective Agency, 46 AD2d 650). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reichle v. Mayeri, 110 A.D.2d 694, 488 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

110 A.D.2d 694 (Reichle v. Mayeri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gillis v. Carmel Richmond Nursing Home Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 50984(U) (New York Supreme Court, Richmond County, 2024)
Gould v. Rempel
99 A.D.3d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Nicholson v. Luce
55 A.D.3d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Allinger v. City of Utica
226 A.D.2d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Hayes v. Schultz
150 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Roth v. El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd.
709 F. Supp. 487 (S.D. New York, 1989)