Reichert v. Reichert

83 N.W. 1008, 124 Mich. 694, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 602
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 31, 1900·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Montgomery, C. J.

This case presents a most unfortunate controversy between husband and wife. The complainant seeks a divorce on the ground of cruelty, predicating the charge in part on an attempt made by her husband to have her committed to an insane asylum. Any general discussion of the causes of dissension between the parties would profit no one. On the contrary, such discussion might tend to widen the breach already existing. We are convinced that the complainant became intensely jealous of her husband without just cause, and the application to have her adjudged insane was made in good faith, and in the belief that the statements attributing improper conduct to the defendant were induced by an unsettled mind. We are not able to find in the defendant’s action in this regard, or in any other respect, such evidence of cruelty as will justify a decree of divorce.

The decree of the court below will be affirmed, but, as we are convinced of the good faith of the appeal, the taxable costs will be allowed to complainant.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reichert v. Reichert, 83 N.W. 1008, 124 Mich. 694, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 602 (Mich. 1900).

83 N.W. 1008 (Reichert v. Reichert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feld v. Feld
197 N.W.2d 306 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
Pierson v. Pierson
88 N.W.2d 500 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1958)
Mack v. Mack
278 N.W. 99 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)
Fresby v. Fresby
214 N.W. 203 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1927)
Pickles v. Anton
189 N.W. 684 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)