Reichenbach v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reichenbach v. Rosen

226 A.D.2d 121, 639 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3307

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 226 A.D.2d 121 (Reichenbach v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reichenbach v. Rosen, 226 A.D.2d 121, 639 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Queens County (James O’Donoghue, J.), entered on or about March 21, 1995, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about February 28, 1995, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The appeal from the order is unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to their claim that defendants had notice of the defective condition of the steps (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836). Nor does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur apply (see, Crosby v Stone, 137 AD2d 785, lv denied 72 NY2d 807). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Queens County (James O’Donoghue, J.), entered on or about March 21, 1995, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about February 28, 1995, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The appeal from the order is unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to their claim that defendants had notice of the defective condition of the steps (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836). Nor does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur apply (see, Crosby v Stone, 137 AD2d 785, lv denied 72 NY2d 807). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 121, 639 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reichenbach-v-rosen-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack