Reichenbach v. McKean

95 Pa. 432, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 342
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1880·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered

Per Curiam.

The sheriff sells only the title of the defendant in the execution, and the real owner, besides trespass against the sheriff, may maintain replevin or trover against his vendee. In the case of a pawn or pledge, there is a special property in the pawnee. It is liable to be sold on an execution against the pawnor but subject to all and singular the rights and interests of the pawnee: Act of June 16th 1836, Pamph. L. 1836. The taking of the property out of the possession of the pawnee was a wrongful act which could not divest his property. His parting with the possession was in no sense a relinquishment of his lien. The pawnor’s title was not infected with any fraud or secret trust, so as to give to a bona fide purchaser from him any better right than he had himself, and the sheriff could convey no better title than the pawnor himself could.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reichenbach v. McKean, 95 Pa. 432, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 342 (Pa. 1880).

95 Pa. 432 (Reichenbach v. McKean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilton Credit Corp. v. Williamson
203 A.2d 389 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Brightwell v. First Nat. Bank of Kissimmee
109 F.2d 271 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
Taylor v. Bailey
185 A. 699 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Nissley v. Heller
16 Pa. D. & C. 784 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
J. H. & C. K. Eagle, Inc. v. Kunkle
122 A. 276 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)