Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.

265 A.D.2d 864, 695 N.Y.S.2d 813

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 1999·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to provide a bill of particulars in a timely manner, nor did they establish the existence of a meritorious claim (see, Koski v Ryder Truck, 244 AD2d 872). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — Vacate Judgment.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to provide a bill of particulars in a timely manner, nor did they establish the existence of a meritorious claim (see, Koski v Ryder Truck, 244 AD2d 872). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — Vacate Judgment.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co., 265 A.D.2d 864, 695 N.Y.S.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

265 A.D.2d 864 (Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related