Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.

Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.

265 A.D.2d 864, 695 N.Y.S.2d 813
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 1999
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 864 (Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co., 265 A.D.2d 864, 695 N.Y.S.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to provide a bill of particulars in a timely manner, nor did they establish the existence of a meritorious claim (see, Koski v Ryder Truck, 244 AD2d 872). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — Vacate Judgment.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koski v. Ryder Truck
244 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 864, 695 N.Y.S.2d 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reichard-willliams-v-miller-electric-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1999.