Reichard v. Michinard
This text of 33 La. Ann. 380 (Reichard v. Michinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The motion to dismiss this appeal is based upon the absence from the transcript of certain documents offered in evidence in the court below, which have been since supplied under certiorari. The date of the writ of seizure and sale is an evident clerical error, as appears from the sheriff’s return and -the date of reception and notice of' the writ therein named. This indicates carelessness in the clerk who made out the transcript; but the error is not sufficiently material to affect the merits of the controversy, and is in no way attributable to the appellant.
The motion to dismiss is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 La. Ann. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reichard-v-michinard-la-1881.