Reich v. Rosselin

26 La. Ann. 418
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1874
DocketNo. 4959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 418 (Reich v. Rosselin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reich v. Rosselin, 26 La. Ann. 418 (La. 1874).

Opinion

Morgan, J.

Plaintiff seeks to injoin the sale of her property, which has been advertised under an order of seizure and sale. She says she was forced by her husband to effect the mortgage for which she is now being proceeded against, and that none of it inured to her benefit, but went, exclusively, to her husband. She applied for authority to borrow the money to a judge of competent jurisdiction, and was by him [419]*419authorized to borrow it. The act of mortgage was not consummated until her authority to borrow had been obtained. If any force, threats, or improper influences were brought to bear upon her by her husband, it does not appear that the defendant, who loaned the money upon the faith of the authorization of the judge and the security of the mortgage,, was, in any manner, a party to it.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed, that there be judgment for the defendant, and that the injunction herein granted be dissolved, with costs in botli courts.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kohlman v. Cochrane
48 So. 914 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reich-v-rosselin-la-1874.