Reich v. Republic of Ghana

Second Circuit

Reich v. Republic of Ghana

56 F. App'x 25

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 2003

DocketNo. 02-5019

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 25 (Reich v. Republic of Ghana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reich v. Republic of Ghana, 56 F. App'x 25 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 24th day of January, two thousand and three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Having reviewed all of the Appellant’s contentions on this appeal and finding in them no merit, the judgment of the District Court affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court (Cornelius Blackshear, Judge) is AFFIRMED for substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s thorough opinion, Reich v. Republic of Ghana, No. 98 civ. 7862, slip op., 2002 WL 142610 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2002) (A 648-58).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 24th day of January, two thousand and three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Having reviewed all of the Appellant’s contentions on this appeal and finding in them no merit, the judgment of the District Court affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court (Cornelius Blackshear, Judge) is AFFIRMED for substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s thorough opinion, Reich v. Republic of Ghana, No. 98 civ. 7862, slip op., 2002 WL 142610 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2002) (A 648-58).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F. App'x 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reich-v-republic-of-ghana-ca2-2003.