Reich v. Reich

160 A. 579, 110 N.J. Eq. 425, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 799
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 16, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case both parties sought a divorce; the husband on the ground of desertion, and the wife in her counter-claim on the ground of extreme cruelty. Both petitions were dismissed. The husband appeals from the decree in so far as it effects the dismissal of his own petition.

Our examination of the proofs convinces us that appellant’s petition was properly dismissed and 'the decree is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Busiciek, Kays, Heteteld, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reich v. Reich, 160 A. 579, 110 N.J. Eq. 425, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 799 (N.J. 1932).

160 A. 579 (Reich v. Reich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.