Reich v. . Mortgage Corp.

168 S.E. 814, 204 N.C. 790, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 12, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Civil action to recover penalty for usury.

The defendant being a foreign corporation, service of summons was sought to be obtained through the Secretary of State as provided by C. S., 1137.

The defendant entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss the action for want of proper service.

Upon evidence sufficient to support the findings, the court found "that the defendant owned property and was doing business at, before and since the starting of this suit and the service of said process, in the State of North Carolina," and upon such findings overruled the motion to dismiss. Defendant appeals, assigning errors. Affirmed on authority of Lunceford v. Association, 190 N.C. 314,129 S.E. 805, R. R. v. Cobb, 190 N.C. 375, 129 S.E. 828. See note, Yale Law Journal (April, 1927), page 882.

Affirmed. *Page 791

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reich v. . Mortgage Corp., 168 S.E. 814, 204 N.C. 790, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 285 (N.C. 1933).

168 S.E. 814 (Reich v. . Mortgage Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. T. H. Corporation v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue
195 S.E. 36 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Denton v. . Vassiliades
193 S.E. 737 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Ruark v. Virginia Trust Co.
174 S.E. 441 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)