Reich v. Kipnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reich v. Kipnis

1 A.D.2d 663, 147 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 663 (Reich v. Kipnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reich v. Kipnis, 1 A.D.2d 663, 147 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified, without costs, so as to provide for the examination of defendants with respect to the hiring of plaintiff and the agreement for his compensation, the professional services rendered by plaintiff, the conduct of the California action and the conduct of plaintiff and defendants with respect to that action, and the receipt of legal fees by defendants in connection with the related RKO litigation. The order is further modified with respect to the examination of plaintiff to provide for his examination in the State of New York at a date to be stipulated by the parties or otherwise fixed by this court upon the settlement of the order on this appeal. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Bastow and Cox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified, without costs, so as to provide for the examination of defendants with respect to the hiring of plaintiff and the agreement for his compensation, the professional services rendered by plaintiff, the conduct of the California action and the conduct of plaintiff and defendants with respect to that action, and the receipt of legal fees by defendants in connection with the related RKO litigation. The order is further modified with respect to the examination of plaintiff to provide for his examination in the State of New York at a date to be stipulated by the parties or otherwise fixed by this court upon the settlement of the order on this appeal. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Bastow and Cox, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 663, 147 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reich-v-kipnis-nyappdiv-1955.