Reich v. Fatool

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Reich v. Fatool

146 A. 911, 109 Conn. 734, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 150

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 13, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An examination and comparison of the evidence has satisfied us that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that there was no sufficient evidence before the jury from which the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence could have been found and that we cannot hold that the ruling setting aside the verdict was erroneous as matter of law.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

An examination and comparison of the evidence has satisfied us that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that there was no sufficient evidence before the jury from which the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence could have been found and that we cannot hold that the ruling setting aside the verdict was erroneous as matter of law.

There is no error.

Reich v. Fatool, 146 A. 911, 109 Conn. 734, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 150 (Colo. 1929).

Pincite

146 A. 911 (Reich v. Fatool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.