Reich v. Fatool

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Reich v. Fatool

146 A. 911, 109 Conn. 734, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 150

DecidedJune 13, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 146 A. 911 (Reich v. Fatool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reich v. Fatool, 146 A. 911, 109 Conn. 734, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 150 (Colo. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An examination and comparison of the evidence has satisfied us that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that there was no sufficient evidence before the jury from which the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence could have been found and that we cannot hold that the ruling setting aside the verdict was erroneous as matter of law.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

An examination and comparison of the evidence has satisfied us that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that there was no sufficient evidence before the jury from which the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence could have been found and that we cannot hold that the ruling setting aside the verdict was erroneous as matter of law.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A. 911, 109 Conn. 734, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reich-v-fatool-conn-1929.