Reibeling v. Reibeling

88 N.W. 1103, 85 Minn. 383, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 407
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 31, 1902·No. Nos. 12,874-(150)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued for a divorce from her husband on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and habitual drunkenness. Respondent denied the charges and filed a cross bill for a divorce from his wife on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The trial court found against the contentions of both parties, denying either of them relief. Appellant appealed from the decision, upon the ground that, as against herself, it was not supported by the facts, and that she was entitled to a divorce, especially upon the charge of drunkenness. The record discloses an unfortunate condition of incompatibility, but we agree with the trial judge that both parties are at fault, and that neither of them is entitled to relief at the hands of the court.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reibeling v. Reibeling, 88 N.W. 1103, 85 Minn. 383, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 407 (Mich. 1902).

88 N.W. 1103 (Reibeling v. Reibeling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hove v. Hove
18 N.W.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1945)
Thorem v. Thorem
246 N.W. 674 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1933)