Reibeling v. Reibeling
This text of 88 N.W. 1103 (Reibeling v. Reibeling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sued for a divorce from her husband on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and habitual drunkenness. Respondent denied the charges and filed a cross bill for a divorce from his wife on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The trial court found against the contentions of both parties, denying either of them relief. Appellant appealed from the decision, upon the ground that, as against herself, it was not supported by the facts, and that she was entitled to a divorce, especially upon the charge of drunkenness. The record discloses an unfortunate condition of incompatibility, but we agree with the trial judge that both parties are at fault, and that neither of them is entitled to relief at the hands of the court.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 N.W. 1103, 85 Minn. 383, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reibeling-v-reibeling-minn-1902.