Rehrey v. City of Newburgh
This text of 28 N.Y.S. 916 (Rehrey v. City of Newburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is perfectly clear that this case cannot be reversed upon the ground that there was any question of negligence that ought to have been submitted to the jury. Indeed, the appellant does not claim that any negligence on the part .of .the city was proved, but he claims that the construction of the sidewalk as constructed constituted a nuisance for which the defendant was liable. This contention has never had any foundation in reason or law.' Such a claim would impose upon every city that constructed a sidewalk to make it level from one end to the other. But it is unnecessary to state any reason for the affirmance' of the judgment herein further than to say that it falls under the principle decided in the case of Urquhart v. City of Ogdensburg, 91 N. Y. 67. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 N.Y.S. 916, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rehrey-v-city-of-newburgh-nysupct-1894.