Rehill v. Mayor of East Newark

68 A. 1116, 74 N.J.L. 849, 45 Vroom 849, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 234
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 17, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 68 A. 1116 (Rehill v. Mayor of East Newark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rehill v. Mayor of East Newark, 68 A. 1116, 74 N.J.L. 849, 45 Vroom 849, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 234 (N.J. 1907).

Opinion

Per, Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ is affirmed upon the grounds set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in the Supreme Court, reported in 44 Vroom 220.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchakd, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Yroom, Green, Gray,.Dill, J.J. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rehill v. Mayor of East Newark
63 A. 81 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A. 1116, 74 N.J.L. 849, 45 Vroom 849, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rehill-v-mayor-of-east-newark-nj-1907.