Reha v. Iowa Supreme Court

Eighth Circuit

Reha v. Iowa Supreme Court

41 F. App'x 15

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 2002

DocketNo. 02-1530

StatusPublished

This text of 41 F. App'x 15 (Reha v. Iowa Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reha v. Iowa Supreme Court, 41 F. App'x 15 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roy Reha appeals from the district court’s¹ order denying his notice of removal and petition for writ of habeas corpus. Reha did not claim his criminal prosecution was racially motivated or that he was a federal officer or agent, see Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 792, 800, 86 S.Ct. 1783, 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (1966); City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 824, 86 S.Ct. 1800, 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (1966); and he failed to allege that he exhausted his state remedies, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A).

Accordingly, we find that the district court properly remanded Reha’s case, see 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4), and we affirm, see [16]*168th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roy Reha appeals from the district court’s¹ order denying his notice of removal and petition for writ of habeas corpus. Reha did not claim his criminal prosecution was racially motivated or that he was a federal officer or agent, see Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 792, 800, 86 S.Ct. 1783, 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (1966); City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 824, 86 S.Ct. 1800, 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (1966); and he failed to allege that he exhausted his state remedies, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A).

Accordingly, we find that the district court properly remanded Reha’s case, see 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4), and we affirm, see [16]*168th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 F. App'x 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reha-v-iowa-supreme-court-ca8-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack