Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association

159 So. 3d 424, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4282, 2015 WL 1360815
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 2015
Docket4D14-934
StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 3d 424 (Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association, 159 So. 3d 424, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4282, 2015 WL 1360815 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The Osorios appeal a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of U.S. Bank National Association (“Bank”). The Bank concedes that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to meet its burden of proving it had standing to enforce the note at the time it filed the complaint. See McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So.3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Because the Bank failed to prove standing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an involuntary dismissal of the complaint.

Reversed and remanded.

CIKLIN, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'n
79 So. 3d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 So. 3d 424, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4282, 2015 WL 1360815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regulo-a-osorio-and-maria-eugenia-osorio-v-us-bank-national-association-fladistctapp-2015.