Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association

159 So. 3d 424, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4282, 2015 WL 1360815

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 2015·No. 4D14-934·Published

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The Osorios appeal a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of U.S. Bank National Association (“Bank”). The Bank concedes that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to meet its burden of proving it had standing to enforce the note at the time it filed the complaint. See McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So.3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Because the Bank failed to prove standing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an involuntary dismissal of the complaint.

Reversed and remanded.

CIKLIN, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The Osorios appeal a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of U.S. Bank National Association (“Bank”). The Bank concedes that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to meet its burden of proving it had standing to enforce the note at the time it filed the complaint. See McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So.3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Because the Bank failed to prove standing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an involuntary dismissal of the complaint.

Reversed and remanded.

CIKLIN, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association, 159 So. 3d 424, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4282, 2015 WL 1360815 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

159 So. 3d 424 (Regulo A. Osorio and Maria Eugenia Osorio v. U.S. Bank National Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related