Regueiro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Regueiro v. State

596 So. 2d 175, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4431, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 987

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1992·No. No. 91-0891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing in accord with the provisions of section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990). At the time of appellant’s sentencing, the legislature had amended section 39.022(5)(c) 3 to provide that a juvenile indicted by a grand jury for one offense, but convicted of a lesser offense, may be sentenced as an adult, pursuant to the provisions of section 39.059(7)(c). On remand, the trial court will still be free to exercise the options provided under section 39.-022(5)(c) 3.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing in accord with the provisions of section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990). At the time of appellant’s sentencing, the legislature had amended section 39.022(5)(c) 3 to provide that a juvenile indicted by a grand jury for one offense, but convicted of a lesser offense, may be sentenced as an adult, pursuant to the provisions of section 39.059(7)(c). On remand, the trial court will still be free to exercise the options provided under section 39.-022(5)(c) 3.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Regueiro v. State, 596 So. 2d 175, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4431, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 987 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

596 So. 2d 175 (Regueiro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related