Regolodo v. United States Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Regolodo v. United States Fire Insurance

109 A.D.3d 603, 970 N.Y.S.2d 705

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 21, 2013·Published

Opinion

— In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover the amount of an unsatisfied judgment against the defendant’s insured, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Buchelsman, J.), dated January 4, 2012, as, in effect, denied their application for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

As no appeal lies as of right from that part of an order which does not decide a motion or cross motion made on notice (see CPLB 5701 [a] [2]; Mohler v Nardone, 53 AD3d 600 [2008]; [604] Young v Young, 49 AD3d 720 [2008]), and since, under the circumstances of this case, we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [c]), the appeal must be dismissed (see Chang v Chen, 101 AD3d 792, 792 [2012]; cf. Coleman v Hayes, 294 AD2d 458, 459 [2002]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover the amount of an unsatisfied judgment against the defendant’s insured, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Buchelsman, J.), dated January 4, 2012, as, in effect, denied their application for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

As no appeal lies as of right from that part of an order which does not decide a motion or cross motion made on notice (see CPLB 5701 [a] [2]; Mohler v Nardone, 53 AD3d 600 [2008]; [604] Young v Young, 49 AD3d 720 [2008]), and since, under the circumstances of this case, we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [c]), the appeal must be dismissed (see Chang v Chen, 101 AD3d 792, 792 [2012]; cf. Coleman v Hayes, 294 AD2d 458, 459 [2002]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Regolodo v. United States Fire Insurance, 109 A.D.3d 603, 970 N.Y.S.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

109 A.D.3d 603 (Regolodo v. United States Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related