Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility
582 A.2d 204, 216 Conn. 824, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 386
This text of 582 A.2d 204 (Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility, 582 A.2d 204, 216 Conn. 824, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 386 (Colo. 1990).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 428, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that an insurer’s special defense of material misrepresentation must be proven by clear and convincing evidence?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the trial court’s limiting instruction to the jury to consider only misrepresentations ‘related to the cause and origin of the fire’ as proof of the special defense, thereby excluding certain evidence, was not likely to have misled the jury?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility
593 A.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
582 A.2d 204, 216 Conn. 824, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rego-v-connecticut-insurance-placement-facility-conn-1990.