Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility

582 A.2d 204, 216 Conn. 824, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 386
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 23, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 428, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that an insurer’s special defense of material misrepresentation must be proven by clear and convincing evidence?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the trial court’s limiting instruction to the jury to consider only misrepresentations ‘related to the cause and origin of the fire’ as proof of the special defense, thereby excluding certain evidence, was not likely to have misled the jury?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility, 582 A.2d 204, 216 Conn. 824, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 386 (Colo. 1990).

582 A.2d 204 (Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility
593 A.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)