Register v. Seafarers Pension Plan

15 F. App'x 94
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2001
DocketNo. 01-1257
StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. App'x 94 (Register v. Seafarers Pension Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Register v. Seafarers Pension Plan, 15 F. App'x 94 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion for a preliminary injunction and subsequent orders implementing the injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Register v. Seafarers Pension Plan, No. CA-00-143-7-F(1) (E.D.N.C. Jan 12 & 22, 2001; Feb. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[95]*95terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F. App'x 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/register-v-seafarers-pension-plan-ca4-2001.