Register v. Register

175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 121, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 231
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1934
DocketNo. 10324
StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E. 490 (Register v. Register) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Register v. Register, 175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 121, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 231 (Ga. 1934).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

A petition in equity was filed, seeking to cancel described deeds. After introduction of evidence the court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs. The exception is to the overruling of the motion for new trial, consisting of the general grounds and four grounds by amendment.

One of the special grounds complains óf the admission of evidence over the objection of movant. The evidence is not set [122]*122out. Another ground complains of the refusal of the court to allow the defendants to introduce evidence. This ground fails to show what the evidence would have been. Both of the grounds are incomplete, and raise no question for decision.

The court erred in directing the verdict, there being a dispusted issue of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 121, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/register-v-register-ga-1934.