Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance

151 S.E.2d 640, 248 S.C. 504, 1966 S.C. LEXIS 216
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 1, 1966·No. 18577·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike certain allegations of the complaint as irrelevant, immaterial, and redundant.

The general rule is well settled that an order refusing to strike allegations in a pleading as irrelevant and redundant is not conclusive upon the trial of the case on the merits and is not appealable. Sparks v. D. M. Dew & Sons, Inc., 230 S. C. 507, 96 S. E. (2d) 488; Winchester v. United Insurance Co., 231 S. C. 288, 98 S. E. (2d) 530; Blackmon v. United Insurance Co., 233 S. C. 424, 105 S. E. (2d) 521; Tate v. Oxner, 236 S. C. 313, 114 S. E. (2d) 225; Mason v. Kresge, 247 S. C. 144, 146 S. E. (2d) 158. Application of the foregoing rule to the present appeal requires that it be dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance, 151 S.E.2d 640, 248 S.C. 504, 1966 S.C. LEXIS 216 (S.C. 1966).

151 S.E.2d 640 (Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCombs v. Bridges
161 S.E.2d 817 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1968)