Regis v. West Sunrise Development Corporation
This text of 943 So. 2d 330 (Regis v. West Sunrise Development Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William P. REGIS, Appellant,
v.
WEST SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Paul E. Taylor, and Ian Gardner, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Ira Marcus of Ira Marcus, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Ian Gardner, Sunrise, pro se.
FARMER, J.
We reverse the summary judgment and remand for trial. The rule of Ellison v. Anderson, 74 So.2d 680 (Fla.1954) (affidavit filed in opposition to motion for summary judgment may not contradict prior deposition testimony), does not apply to an affidavit of a witness purporting to be the first expression by the witness under oath in the litigation as to a fact in dispute even though it contradicts a prior out-of-court, non-sworn statement by the witness in a corporate document. See Andrews v. Midland Nat'l Ins. Co., 208 So.2d 136, 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (holding that witness is not irrevocably bound by his first written statement upon the issues of a case); see also Lawrence v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack Inc., 842 So.2d 303, 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (holding that court is required to view record evidence, including properly asserted supporting affidavits, in light most favorable to non-moving party, and if slightest doubt exists summary judgment must be reversed).
Reversed.
SHAHOOD, J., and LEWIS, TERRY P., Associate Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
943 So. 2d 330, 2006 WL 3613738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regis-v-west-sunrise-development-corporation-fladistctapp-2006.