Regino Quinones v. State
This text of Regino Quinones v. State (Regino Quinones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 29, 2020
No. 04-20-00485-CR
Regino QUINONES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR13882 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant Regino Quiñones filed a notice of appeal asserting that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the cause for violations of his right to a speedy trial. Appellant’s notice of appeal states that “[t]he appealable [o]rder by the trial court was signed on September 04, 2020.” The clerk’s record contains Appellant’s Second Demand for Speedy Trial and Demand for Dismissal for Failure to Provide a Speedy Trial. In the upper right-hand corner of the first page are handwritten notes that include “4 Sep 2020” and brief notes which could have been made by the presiding judge of the trial court. However, there is no written, signed order denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss. As this court has repeatedly held, “the judge’s notes are for his or her own convenience and form no part of the record.” State v. Fuller, No. 04-96-00898-CR, 1997 WL 136541, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 26, 1997, no pet.) (per curiam); accord In re L.H., No. 04-13- 00174-CV, 2013 WL 3804585, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 17, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (“A judge’s handwritten notes are for his or her own convenience and form no part of the record.”); In re A.W., 384 S.W.3d 872, 873 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, no pet.) (citing Fuller, 1997 WL 136541, at *1). The appellate record does not contain an appealable order. See Fuller, 1997 WL 136541, at *1. We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If Appellant does not timely provide written proof as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed. See id. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of October, 2020.
___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Regino Quinones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regino-quinones-v-state-texapp-2020.