Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 2024·No. 2024-1210·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 28, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-1210

Lower Tribunal No. F82-26408A

Reginald Wright,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Reginald Wright, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Frances v. State, 143 So. 3d 340, 357 (Fla. 2014)

(explaining that “the failure of appellate counsel to raise [a] meritless issue will not render appellate counsel’s performance ineffective” (citing Rutherford v. Moore, 774 So. 2d 637, 643 (Fla. 2000))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida (Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutherford v. Moore
774 So. 2d 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
David Sylvester Frances v. State of Florida
143 So. 3d 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)