Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida
This text of Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida (Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 28, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1210 Lower Tribunal No. F82-26408A ________________
Reginald Wright, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
Reginald Wright, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Denied. See Frances v. State, 143 So. 3d 340, 357 (Fla. 2014)
(explaining that “the failure of appellate counsel to raise [a] meritless issue
will not render appellate counsel’s performance ineffective” (citing
Rutherford v. Moore, 774 So. 2d 637, 643 (Fla. 2000))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reginald Wright v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-wright-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.