Reginald W. Spivey v. Trenita Gail Spivey
Opinion
Opinion issued October 22, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00015-CV ——————————— REGINALD W. SPIVEY, Appellant V. TRENITA GAIL SPIVEY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-44699
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant attempts to appeal from an order setting entry date/hearing, but
such an order is not reviewable by appeal. When a party attempts to appeal a non-
1 Counsel for Appellant: Ronald G. Ray Counsel for Appellee: Greg Abbott Trial court Judge: Hon. David Farr appealable interlocutory order, the appellate court has no jurisdiction except to
dismiss the appeal. See Nikoulouzos v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, 162 S.W.3d
678, 681 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.). Ten days’ notice of
intent to dismiss was given to all parties in accordance with Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42.3. No party has responded to the notice. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as
moot.
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reginald W. Spivey v. Trenita Gail Spivey (Reginald W. Spivey v. Trenita Gail Spivey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.