Reginald Tomlin v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Reginald Tomlin v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Reginald Tomlin v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128868 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan REGINALD TOMLIN, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
v SC: 128868 AGC: 2795/03; 0656/05 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 29, 2005 _________________________________________ s1121 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reginald Tomlin v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-tomlin-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2005.