Reginald Munoz v. Caden York
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-26-00122-CV
REGINALD MUNOZ, Appellant V.
CADEN YORK, Appellee
On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC89-CV2023-2209
Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On February 25, 2026, and March 11, 2026, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant has not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
Because appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: April 23, 2026
See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 1
in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reginald Munoz v. Caden York (Reginald Munoz v. Caden York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.