Reginald John Adams v. United States

323 F.2d 616, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 314, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4189

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal from the conviction of appellant Adams of violation of the Narcotics Act, 1 *and from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Counsel appointed by this court 2 has ably briefed and vigorously argued the case. However, we are unable to find error affecting substantial rights. It follows that the judgments of the District Court must be and are

Affirmed.

1 . 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (1958), 21 U.S.C. § 174 (1958).

2 . Present counsel was not trial counsel in the District Court but, by our appointment, entered bis appearance in that court and prepared and argued the motion for new trial there, and, as well, argued the appeal here.