Reginald John Adams v. United States

323 F.2d 616, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 314, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4189
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 1963
Docket17896_1
StatusPublished

This text of 323 F.2d 616 (Reginald John Adams v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reginald John Adams v. United States, 323 F.2d 616, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 314, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4189 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal from the conviction of appellant Adams of violation of the Narcotics Act, 1 *and from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Counsel appointed by this court 2 has ably briefed and vigorously argued the *617 case. However, we are unable to find error affecting substantial rights. It follows that the judgments of the District Court must be and are

Affirmed.

1

. 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (1958), 21 U.S.C. § 174 (1958).

2

. Present counsel was not trial counsel in the District Court but, by our appointment, entered bis appearance in that court and prepared and argued the motion for new trial there, and, as well, argued the appeal here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 174
21 U.S.C. § 174
§ 4705
26 U.S.C. § 4705(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 F.2d 616, 116 U.S. App. D.C. 314, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-john-adams-v-united-states-cadc-1963.