Reginald Jermaine Miles v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 21, 2002
Docket06-01-00160-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Reginald Jermaine Miles v. State (Reginald Jermaine Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reginald Jermaine Miles v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-01-00160-CR
______________________________


REGINALD JERMAINE MILES, Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 183rd Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court No. 856700





Before Cornelius, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.
Opinion by Chief Justice Cornelius


O P I N I O N


Reginald Miles has appealed from his conviction on his plea of guilty without a plea bargain for the offense of theft. He was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment and a $5,000.00 fine. The clerk's record was filed on October 4, 2001, and the reporter's record was filed on December 11, 2001. The brief was thus due on January 10, 2002.

On December 11, we sent a letter to Mike Glover, the retained attorney who represented Miles at trial, reminding him that the appellate brief was due. Thirty days later, Glover faxed a response to this office in which he states that he was retained by Miles only for trial. Glover states that on the day of sentencing Miles informed him that he had hired another attorney. Glover states that he then asked the trial court for permission to withdraw, and that his motion was denied. The notice of appeal was signed by attorney George Real III. We also contacted his office, and he disclaimed any knowledge of the case.

Because of the apparent confusion, we abated this case to the trial court with directions to conduct a hearing and determine whether Miles was represented by counsel, and also to determine whether Miles wished to continue his appeal.

The hearing has been conducted, with both attorneys in attendance. Miles was brought before the court, and after being questioned by the court, he stated that he had discussed the situation with both attorneys, and that he no longer wished to pursue his appeal. He formally requested at that time that the Court of Appeals allow him to withdraw his appeal.

His request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.



William J. Cornelius

Chief Justice



Date Submitted: February 21, 2002

Date Decided: February 21, 2002



Do Not Publish

ion Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-10-00046-CV

                               IN THE INTEREST OF P.D.D., A CHILD

                                         On Appeal from the 5th Judicial District Court

                                                             Bowie County, Texas

                                                      Trial Court No. 93D1350-005

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

            Vickey McAllister has filed a notice of appeal from an order involving, among other things, an award of child support.  On July 28, 2010, we mailed a letter to appellant’s counsel requesting that counsel show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal regarding the untimely filing of the notice of appeal.  The order on child support was signed February 11, 2010, and a timely motion for new trial was filed, but the notice of appeal was not filed until June 7, 2010.  The notice of appeal was due to be filed within ninety days after the judgment was signed, no later than May 12, 2010.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).  In the absence of a timely notice of appeal, we have no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

            In our letter, we directed counsel to show this Court how we had jurisdiction and informed him that if no response was received by August 9, 2010, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is now August 11, 2010, and no response has been received.

            We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          August 11, 2010

Date Decided:             August 12, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reginald Jermaine Miles v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-jermaine-miles-v-state-texapp-2002.