Reginald Ford v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC
This text of Reginald Ford v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (Reginald Ford v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; Opinion Filed September 4, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00567-CV
REGINALD FORD, Appellant V. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 471-03437-2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past
due. By postcard dated June 2, 2020, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was
due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly
cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also
by postcard dated June 2, 2020, we informed appellant the docketing statement in
this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement
within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.
By letter dated June 30, 2020, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to
provide, within ten days, (1) verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the
clerk’s record, or (2) written documentation that appellant had been found entitled
to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so
would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. And by order
dated July 15, 2020, we again directed appellant to provide verification that he had
paid for the clerk’s record and cautioned him the appeal was subject to dismissal if
he failed to do so. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required
documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this
appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).
/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
200567F.P05
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
REGINALD FORD, Appellant On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-20-00567-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 471-03437- 2019. RUSHMORE LOAN Opinion delivered by Justice Partida- MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Kipness. Justices Schenck and Appellee Osborne participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant REGINALD FORD.
Judgment entered this 4th day of September, 2020.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reginald Ford v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-ford-v-rushmore-loan-management-services-llc-texapp-2020.