Reginald Earl Allmon v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00556-CR
Reginald Earl ALLMON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CR9047 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2022
DISMISSED
Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Reginald Earl Allmon pled nolo contendere to
aggravated sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to twenty years of imprisonment and a
$2000 fine in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. The trial court signed a
certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Allmon filed a notice of
appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See 04-22-00556-CR
id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has
been filed. See id. 25.2(d).
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised
by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to
appeal; or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The
clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment assessed by the
court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by Allmon.
See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor
does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. Thus, the trial court’s
certification appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Allmon does not
have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has
the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).
We informed Allmon that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that he had the
right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v.
State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant filed a response,
indicating that he was unable to persuade the trial court to grant him permission to appeal. Because
no amended trial court certification has been filed stating that Allmon has the right to appeal, this
appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reginald Earl Allmon v. the State of Texas (Reginald Earl Allmon v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.