Reginald Donell Rice v. the State of Texas
This text of Reginald Donell Rice v. the State of Texas (Reginald Donell Rice v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 1, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00792-CR No. 05-21-00793-CR REGINALD DONELL RICE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-76788-R & F14-76789-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Osborne On September 10, 2021, Reginald Donald Rice filed a notice of appeal,
complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion for chapter 64 DNA
testing in the above cases. Seventeen days later, he filed a motion to perfect the
appeal and another notice of appeal. The district clerk subsequently informed the
Court that there is no written signed order disposing of appellant’s motion for DNA
testing.
An appellate court has jurisdiction to determine an appeal only if the appeal
is authorized by law. Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App.
2008). When the appellate court’s jurisdiction is not legally invoked, the court’s power to act is as absent as if it did not exist. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523
(Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellate courts may consider criminal appeals only after
final conviction or the entry of a narrow set of appealable interlocutory orders. TEX.
R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas
1998, no pet.).
As previously noted, the district clerk’s office confirmed there is no written
signed order in these cases. Under these circumstances, we lack jurisdiction over
these appeals. See Nikrasch v. State, 698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1985,
no pet.) (court of appeals has no jurisdiction over appeal absent written judgment or
order).
/Leslie Osborne// 210792f.u05 LESLIE OSBORNE 210793f.u05 JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
REGINALD DONELL RICE, On Appeal from the 265th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-76788-R. No. 05-21-00792-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Reichek participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
Judgment entered this 1st day of October, 2021.
–3– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
REGINALD DONELL RICE, On Appeal from the 265th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-76789-R. No. 05-21-00793-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Reichek participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
–4–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reginald Donell Rice v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-donell-rice-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.