Reginald Dale Peters v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 2012·No. 02-11-00243-CV·Published

Opinion

02-11-243-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00243-CV

Reginald Dale Peters

APPELLANT

V.

The State of Texas

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 355th District Court OF Hood COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

On February 6, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  We have not received any response.

On November 23, 2011, appellant filed a “Motion To Correct Erroneous Filing Fee’s.”  We have considered that motion.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and deny the “Motion To Correct Erroneous Filing Fee’s.”  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).”

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GABRIEL, J; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J. 

DELIVERED:  March 1, 2012



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reginald Dale Peters v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Reginald Dale Peters v. State (Reginald Dale Peters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.