Reginald Dale Peters v. State
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-11-00243-CV
|
Reginald Dale Peters |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
The State of Texas |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 355th District Court OF Hood COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On February 6, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
On November 23, 2011, appellant filed a “Motion To Correct Erroneous Filing Fee’s.” We have considered that motion.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and deny the “Motion To Correct Erroneous Filing Fee’s.” See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).”
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: March 1, 2012
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reginald Dale Peters v. State (Reginald Dale Peters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.