Reginald Clayton Cannon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 12, 2012
Docket07-12-00247-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Reginald Clayton Cannon v. State (Reginald Clayton Cannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reginald Clayton Cannon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0247-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 12, 2012 ______________________________

REGINALD CLAYTON CANNON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee _________________________________

FROM THE 181[ST] DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 58,097-B; HON. JOHN BOARD, PRESIDING _______________________________

Order of Dismissal _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK, and PIRTLE, JJ. Reginald Clayton Cannon, appellant, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court imposed his sentence in open court on December 10, 2011. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal on June 18, 2012. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). No motion for new trial having been filed here, appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed by January 9, 2012. Because it was not so filed until June 18, 2012, and because no extension of that deadline was sought, it was late. A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellants appeal is dismissed.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reginald Clayton Cannon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-clayton-cannon-v-state-texapp-2012.