Reginald Bryant v. State of Florida
This text of Reginald Bryant v. State of Florida (Reginald Bryant v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
REGINALD BRYANT, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D16-0667
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. __________________________/
Opinion filed March 11, 2016.
Petition for Writ of Nunc Pro Tunc -- Original Jurisdiction.
Reginald Bryant, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The “petition for writ of nunc pro tunc” is treated as a petition for writ of
habeas corpus, and is denied without prejudice to petitioner presenting his claim to
the lower tribunal.
THOMAS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reginald Bryant v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginald-bryant-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.