Reginal M. Hardy v. State of Florida
This text of Reginal M. Hardy v. State of Florida (Reginal M. Hardy v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-3321 LT Case No. 2012-CF-040227-A _____________________________
REGINAL M. HARDY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Kathryn Michele Speicher, Judge.
Reginal M. Hardy, Cocoa, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
July 15, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Finrock v. Fla. Civ. Commitment Ctr., 34 So. 3d 777, 778−79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (affirming the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus “without prejudice to him exhausting his administrative remedies . . . and then seeking further relief in the appropriate circuit court if necessary”). JAY, C.J., and MAKAR and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reginal M. Hardy v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reginal-m-hardy-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.