REGINA NAGLE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. ROSEMARY MCCOY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM) (CONSOLIDATED)

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedFebruary 11, 2022
DocketA-2758-19/A-3887-19
StatusUnpublished

This text of REGINA NAGLE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. ROSEMARY MCCOY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM) (CONSOLIDATED) (REGINA NAGLE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. ROSEMARY MCCOY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM) (CONSOLIDATED)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
REGINA NAGLE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. ROSEMARY MCCOY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM) (CONSOLIDATED), (N.J. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2758-19 A-3887-19

REGINA NAGLE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

Respondent-Respondent. _____________________________

ROSEMARY MCCOY,

Submitted November 29, 2021 – Decided February 11, 2022

Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from the Board of Trustees of the State Police Retirement System, Department of Treasury, Docket Nos. xx-3425 and xx-3426.

Lauren Sandy, attorney for appellants.

Andrew J. Bruck, Acting Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Christopher Meyer, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, the parties having filed a stipulation of

dismissal. We must point out appellants' counsel notified the court on January

21, 2022, that this matter was being dismissed because respondent issued a

final agency decision on July 29, 2022, which reconsidered and granted the

relief appellants requested due to newly enacted legislation. Unbeknownst to

the court, that decision was rendered four months before we considered the

appeal on November 29, 2021. While we appreciate counsel's representation

that there were administrative issues in implementing the decision, she had a

responsibility to alert the court of the probable resolution to avoid unnecessary

waste of judicial resources. See Sessner v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 435

N.J. Super. 347 (App. Div. 2014). In fact, our decision in this appeal was

scheduled to be released on January 24, 2022, but was pulled upon notification

of the dismissal.

A-2758-19 2 Dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

A-2758-19 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A-4977-11t3 Jo Ann Sessner v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
89 A.3d 191 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
REGINA NAGLE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. ROSEMARY MCCOY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM) (CONSOLIDATED), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regina-nagle-v-board-of-trustees-etc-rosemary-mccoy-v-board-of-njsuperctappdiv-2022.