Regina Coates v. Southwest Airlines Company
This text of 627 F. App'x 581 (Regina Coates v. Southwest Airlines Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Regina D. Coates appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her action under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Upon de novo review, see Burciaga v. Ravago Americas, LLC, 791 F.3d 930, 934 (8th Cir.2015), we agree with the district court that there were no jury issues on Coates’s FMLA discrimination claim, see Hudson v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., 787 F.3d 861, 866 (8th Cir.2015) (discrimination claim arises when employer takes adverse action against employee for exercising rights to. which she is entitled under FMLA; where employer bases its adverse decision on honestly-held belief unrelated to FMLA, it is not discriminatory even if belief is mistaken); or on her FMLA entitlement claim, as she was granted such leave, see Quinn v. St. Louis County, 653 F.3d 745, 753 (8th Cir.2011) (for interference (also known as entitlement) claim, employers are prohibited from interfering with, restraining, or denying employee’s exercise or attempted exercise of any right contained in FMLA; while interference includes discouraging employee from using such leave, employee must also show that employer denied employee entitlements under FMLA). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 F. App'x 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regina-coates-v-southwest-airlines-company-ca8-2016.