Reggie Smith v. State
This text of Reggie Smith v. State (Reggie Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-18-00116-CR
REGGIE SMITH, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 15F0002-102
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER
Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they
contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number,
passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government-issued
personal identification number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record and volume 31
of the reporter’s record include social security numbers. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders
otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices,
must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
clerk’s record and volume 31 of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of
this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s
record and volume 31 of the reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 24, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reggie Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reggie-smith-v-state-texapp-2019.