Reggie Copeland v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 8, 2015
DocketA15A1862
StatusPublished

This text of Reggie Copeland v. State (Reggie Copeland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reggie Copeland v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 29, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1862. REGGIE COPELAND v. THE STATE.

Reggie Copeland was found guilty of obstruction of an officer and riot in a penal institution. The trial court denied his motion for new trial, and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. See Copeland v. State, 281 Ga. App. 11 (635 SE2d 283) (2006). Copeland later filed an extraordinary motion for new trial. In an order entered on July 28, 2014, the trial court denied the motion. On August 29, 2014, Copeland filed a notice of appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, an order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial may only be appealed by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Copeland’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. See Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (“compliance with the discretionary appeal procedure is jurisdictional”). Second, even if Copeland had a right of direct appeal here, his appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of a directly appealable order, OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), and the proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. State v. Andrade, 330 Ga. App. 549 (768 SE2d 525) (2015). Here, Copeland filed his notice of appeal 31 days after entry of the order denying his extraordinary motion for new trial. For these reasons, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is therefore DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 06/29/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fabe v. Floyd
405 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Copeland v. State
635 S.E.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Balkcom v. State
489 S.E.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
The State v. Andrade
768 S.E.2d 525 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reggie Copeland v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reggie-copeland-v-state-gactapp-2015.