Regester v. Longwood Ambulance Co.

764 A.2d 19, 564 Pa. 34, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 595

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Regester v. Longwood Ambulance Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 564 Pa. 35 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 5, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following questions:

a. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that Longwood Fire Company is a local agency under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, whether the decision of Longwood’s paramedics to ignore the 911 dispatcher’s directions constituted “operation” of a motor vehicle under the vehicle exception to governmental immunity?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following questions:

a. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that Longwood Fire Company is a local agency under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, whether the decision of Longwood’s paramedics to ignore the 911 dispatcher’s directions constituted “operation” of a motor vehicle under the vehicle exception to governmental immunity?

Regester v. Longwood Ambulance Co., 764 A.2d 19, 564 Pa. 34, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 595 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

764 A.2d 19 (Regester v. Longwood Ambulance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.