Regester v. Edward Barr Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Regester v. Edward Barr Co.

27 Jones & S. 586, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 586

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 4, 1891·Published

Opinion

The question involved on the appeal was one of fact which on the trial was sharply litigated and submitted to the jury on three different theories. There was no exception to the charge and no request made to charge otherwise. The jury found a verdict in accordance with one of the theories submitted. The Court (Freedman, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurring) held that the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The question involved on the appeal was one of fact which on the trial was sharply litigated and submitted to the jury on three different theories. There was no exception to the charge and no request made to charge otherwise. The jury found a verdict in accordance with one of the theories submitted. The Court (Freedman, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurring) held that the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Regester v. Edward Barr Co., 27 Jones & S. 586, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 586 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

27 Jones & S. 586 (Regester v. Edward Barr Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.