Regent Discount Corp. v. Ortiz

32 Misc. 2d 431, 211 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3411
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 9, 1961·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The circumstances herein show a retaking of the television set by virtue of the conditional sales contract, making operative the provisions of the Personal Property Law, and not an acquisition by reason of a new agreement superseding such sales contract. The retaining of the set since August, 1958, without exercising the privilege of resale releases [432]*432the purchaser from further liability under the sales contract (Eager, Chattel Mortgages and Conditional Sales [Perm, ed.], § 415, p. 544; see, also, Interstate Ice & Power Corp. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 243 N. Y. 95, 99).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Regent Discount Corp. v. Ortiz, 32 Misc. 2d 431, 211 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1961).

32 Misc. 2d 431 (Regent Discount Corp. v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interstate Ice & Power Corp. v. United States Fire Insurance
152 N.E. 476 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)