Regency Insurance Co. v. Matson Insurance & Bonding, Inc.
This text of 587 So. 2d 676 (Regency Insurance Co. v. Matson Insurance & Bonding, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A review of the record reflects sufficient evidence, including reasonable inferences that may properly be drawn therefrom, so as to entitle the appellant to have its case submitted to a jury for the determination of the questions of fact. See Brown v. Sims, 538 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to grant the appellee’s Motion for Directed Verdict.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 So. 2d 676, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10765, 1991 WL 217854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regency-insurance-co-v-matson-insurance-bonding-inc-fladistctapp-1991.