Regency Flowers, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Regency Flowers, Inc. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1072, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3374

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 6, 1969

DocketNo. P69/60; protests 66/72919, etc. (New York); No. P69/61; protests 68/21463, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1072 (Regency Flowers, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Regency Flowers, Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1072, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3374 (cusc 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the plastic artificial flowers in Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the plastic artificial flowers in Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Cust. Ct. 1072, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regency-flowers-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack